This
BullExchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have long been a popular choice for investors seeking diversification and ease of access to the markets. Traditionally dominated by passive strategies, the ETF landscape is witnessing a surge in actively managed ETFs, as highlighted in ETF.com’s Global Investor Survey. Meanwhile, Separately Managed Accounts (SMAs) remain a robust alternative for those prioritizing customization and direct ownership of securities. Here’s a comprehensive look at ETFs, their evolving role in portfolios, and how they stack up against SMAs for retail investors.
What Are ETFs?
ETFs are pooled investment vehicles that hold a mix of assets, such as stocks, bonds, or commodities, allowing investors to purchase shares on a stock exchange. They combine the diversification benefits of mutual funds with the trading flexibility of individual stocks.
Active vs. Passive ETFs
- Passive ETFs: These track a specific index (e.g., S&P 500), offering broad market exposure at a low cost.
- Actively Managed ETFs: Professional portfolio managers actively select investments, aiming to outperform benchmarks or achieve specific goals, such as mitigating volatility.
Separately Managed Accounts (SMAs): A Contrast
SMAs are portfolios of individual securities managed on behalf of an investor by a professional manager. Unlike ETFs, investors in SMAs own the securities outright, allowing for tailored strategies and personalized tax benefits.
Comparing ETFs and SMAs
Advantages of ETFs
- Cost Efficiency: ETFs, particularly passive ones, typically have lower expense ratios than SMAs due to their standardized structures.
- Liquidity: ETFs can be traded throughout the day on stock exchanges, offering flexibility in timing trades.
- Diversification: A single ETF can provide exposure to a broad range of assets, reducing the risk associated with individual securities.
- Ease of Access: ETFs are accessible through most brokerage accounts, with no minimum investment requirements
Disadvantages of ETFs
- Limited Customization: Investors have no control over the underlying assets in an ETF.
- Tax Considerations: While ETFs are tax-efficient compared to mutual funds, they don’t offer the level of tax customization available in SMAs.
- Management Variability: Active ETFs depend heavily on the skill of portfolio managers, and higher fees may not always translate to better returns.
Advantages of SMAs
- Customization: SMAs allow for personalized strategies, including alignment with ethical or sector preferences.
- Tax Optimization: Investors can harvest tax losses and control the timing of capital gains or losses, potentially reducing tax liabilities.
- Direct Ownership: Holding individual securities provides transparency and flexibility in adjusting positions.
Disadvantages of SMAs
- Higher Costs: SMAs often come with higher management fees and account minimums, making them less accessible to smaller investors.
- Complexity: Managing individual securities requires greater oversight and communication with the account manager.
- Lower Liquidity: Individual securities may be harder to trade compared to the immediate liquidity of ETFs.
Kovitz Investment Group Partners, LLC (“Kovitz”) is an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This report should only be considered as a tool in any investment decision and should not be used by itself to make investment decisions. Opinions expressed are only our current opinions or our opinions on the posting date. Any graphs, data, or information in this publication are considered reliably sourced, but no representation is made that it is accurate or complete and should not be relied upon as such. This information is subject to change without notice at any time, based on market and other conditions. Past performance is not indicative of future results, which may vary.
